<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Viral Ideals of Free Software</title>
	<atom:link href="/2013/05/02/the-viral-ideals-of-free-software/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://simulacrum.cc/2013/05/02/the-viral-ideals-of-free-software/</link>
	<description>Technology, economics, and anthropology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2014 15:29:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: X</title>
		<link>https://simulacrum.cc/2013/05/02/the-viral-ideals-of-free-software/comment-page-1/#comment-1005</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[X]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 12:57:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://simulacrum.cc/?p=454#comment-1005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Lui - great post! I&#039;m still frustrated by F/OSS, though - to me, it seems to deny the value of &#039;time, money, programs and equipment are greatly needed&#039;, and does not really reward those who offer these up. 

Members of the F/OSS community are credited with recognition of &#039;authorship&#039;, but it seems that the real winners are the initiators of F/OSS software which goes on to be successful - we&#039;ve all heard of Jimmy Wales, Richard Stallman and Linus Torvalds, but what of the hundreds of others who devote time to their projects? Are they seen as equally influential? Are they offered jobs, book deals and speaking engagements outside of the F/OSS community?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Lui &#8211; great post! I&#8217;m still frustrated by F/OSS, though &#8211; to me, it seems to deny the value of &#8216;time, money, programs and equipment are greatly needed&#8217;, and does not really reward those who offer these up. </p>
<p>Members of the F/OSS community are credited with recognition of &#8216;authorship&#8217;, but it seems that the real winners are the initiators of F/OSS software which goes on to be successful &#8211; we&#8217;ve all heard of Jimmy Wales, Richard Stallman and Linus Torvalds, but what of the hundreds of others who devote time to their projects? Are they seen as equally influential? Are they offered jobs, book deals and speaking engagements outside of the F/OSS community?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Wikipedia&#8217;s Millionth Russian Page Is Worth Celebrating &#124; Simulacrum</title>
		<link>https://simulacrum.cc/2013/05/02/the-viral-ideals-of-free-software/comment-page-1/#comment-998</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Why Wikipedia&#8217;s Millionth Russian Page Is Worth Celebrating &#124; Simulacrum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 18:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://simulacrum.cc/?p=454#comment-998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] software movement, and ports them to the wider cultural sphere (something I have argued in detail before). The subversive nature of Wikipedia does not lie in its language, political vision, or rejection [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] software movement, and ports them to the wider cultural sphere (something I have argued in detail before). The subversive nature of Wikipedia does not lie in its language, political vision, or rejection [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
